LIRG
committee meeting (No 100) 3 February 2003
Held at SCONUL, 103 Euston Street, London
Present
Noeleen Cookman, Alan Cooper, J Eric Davies, Biddy Fisher (Chair),
Eddie Halpin, Philip Payne, Carolynn Rankin (minutes), Isobel Thompson
1.Apologies
Apologies were received from Juliet Eve, Elizabeth Gadd, Liz Hart,
Shelagh Levett, Maxine Melling, Clare Nankivell, John Sumsion
The Committee extended best wishes to John Sumsion who was unable
to attend the meeting.
2.
Chair's Announcements
It was agreed that BF would write to organisations where LIRG has
co-optees - there was an opportunity to change our partnerships
in view of the new SIG status. We would ask to attend the next convenient
meeting to provide an update.
BAILER EH
Society of Chief Librarians NC
Health BF
Working links
were already very positive with SCONUL. There was existing good
practice and the recent joint event had been successful .
Other links
were suggested with the AHRB, SRC and JISC.
There was potential for collaboration with other CILIP groups and
this would be followed up by BF and JED with the Update editor Elspeth
Hyams.
Action: BF and JED
The Umbrella event would provide a good opportunity to talk informally.
Delegates could attend other SIG AGMs to help raise the LIRG profile.
3.
Minutes of the previous meeting 6th November 2002
It was noted that the EGM had been held on 2 December 2002. Applications
for proxy voting had been very popular and had worked well. BF recorded
thanks to Jo Horsfall for administrative support, to the Vice chair
for conducting the meeting and NC for taking the EGM minutes.
NC raised the
issue of electronic proxy voting. The new draft rules accommodate
this. It was agreed this should be an item for future discussion.
5.
LIRG-CILIP assimilation
The LIRG submission is being considered at the CILIP Professional
Practice Committee on 6th February 2003. This will then be considered
at full Council on 12th February 2003. Bob McKee has been supportive
and a press release was issued following the LIRG EGM.
We need to
address administrative and practical issues relating to the officer
posts. Sue Brown is a key contact. Thanks were recorded to BF and
JED for progressing the draft proposed rules within the very tight
timescale. There had been some email consultation with LIRG committee
members and responses were incorporated. JED will re-circulate the
draft rules.
Action: JED
It was noted that 270 signatures had been received in support of
the SIG. Once LIRG is a SIG of CILIP AC will not be co-opted to
the committee but will the liaison officer. NC also offered support
to BF and JED.
6.
Events
Umbrella 2003 3rd-5th July, UMIST
BF had to decide on the programme slots in a short space of time
at the Umbrella planning meeting.
The issue of
attendance by LIRG committee members was discussed as this relates
to funding. It was agreed that LIRG would offer travel costs to
committee members on Thursday 3 July and Friday 4 July where their
organisation would not provide funding. It was noted that anyone
just attending the AGM could book to attend as an exhibition visitor.
The LIRG committee supported the request to fund Jo Horsfall's
attendance at the Umbrella 2003 as this would be regarded as a staff
development opportunity.
Action: PP
It was anticipated the LIRG committee members would dine together
on the Thursday evening with the chosen venue being the Crown Plaza
event. Attendance at the Friday night sessions would be at own expense.
Details of the conference costs were in the CILIP Umbrella 2003
brochure and a copy would be forwarded to the treasurer.
Action: CR
Umbrella
2003 - LIRG programme sessions
Thursday 3rd July
LIRG AGM at 18.30
It was agreed that this session should also be a reception to promote
LIRG - "Learn about LIRG." As the session would
be used as a recruitment drive it was agreed to provide wine and
cheese . The evening AGM was not considered an appropriate time
for the LIRG prize winners to receive their awards. This would require
LIRG to provide overnight accommodation, and the morning session
on Friday 4th July will provide a more suitable audience, particularly
as Bob McKee can present the awards.
Friday 4th
July 2003
11.30 Bob McKee - setting the scene
Presentation of postgraduate prizes
Elsevier prize winner/presentation
14.30 - panel
session chaired by BF
Following considerable
discussion it was decided to use the theme title "Celebration
of practice based research". The session would be chaired by
BF with an introductory presentation by JED
Case studies from the field:
Sally Bradley - electronic support to students BF to contact
Maggie Haines - health perspective BF to contact
Kerry Wilson - de-professionalism in the sector EH to contact
Debbie Hicks - Books Connect JED to contact
PP suggested
previous Daphne Clark prize winners could be asked.
Those presenting a case study need to be briefed and EH agreed to
prepare a briefing specification. Those contacting potential speakers
need to let EH know if they are available. EH will then provide
details of LIRG speakers to J Thompson at CILIP Events Planning.
Action: EH
Publicity
It will be important to publicise the LIRG sessions. LB would be
asked to provide details in the Update diary, the LIRG website,
and via the usual memberships lists.
Action: LB
It was suggested that extra copies of LIR (about 35) would be needed
for the LIRG reception as additional publicity
Action: EG
It was agreed
that it would be helpful to have information on LIRG included in
the Umbrella delegates pack. AC will find out when material is needed
for the packs although. this may not be possible as the exhibitors
pay for their material to be included.
Action AC.
Action: BF will ask LB to explore the additional publicity opportunities.
6.
Research Methods Courses
PP reported that all four workshops have taken place. The Questionnaire
workshop had proved most popular and the high attendance made the
series viable. It is touch and go as to whether the workshops will
make a profit or break even. Feedback from participants had been
mixed. BF gave her general impression on the feedback. Some participants
thought there was too much material, but we need to recognise that
the workshop content challenges intellectually. JED was concerned
that one workshop is much more popular that the others as it is
important to look at all available techniques and methods.
The Committee discussed running the research workshops again using
the same format. Advertising in advance should increase the viability.
Some pre-course preparation for the topics should be a prerequisite.
It was agreed to run the workshop series again next year. PP and
IT would meet DH and DS to develop another delivery of the series.
After this the feedback about delivery and content would be reviewed.
Action: PP and IT
It was noted
that the workshops had not yet been discussed with YMLAC
Action: PP and BF
NC raised the issue of mentoring but it was felt the Committee could
not take this on board at the present time. JED suggested using
the LIRG web site for peer group support. EH suggested that those
interested could be directed to some of the action research websites;
appropriate guidance to the sites could be provided by DS and DH.
It was noted
that there are issues about the potential accreditation of these
workshops in the future, particularly relating to changes when LIRG
will be a SIG of CILIP. The LIRG committee will need to discuss
this at a future stage.
7.
Evidence based web design.
AC and MW are still working on the proposal for this event
Action: AC and MW
8.
Do Libraries Aid Learning Seminar - feedback
A report on this LIRG/SCONUL ACPI event was tabled by PP. The seminar
was held 9-10 December 2002 in Scarborough and was facilitated by
David Streatfield and Sharon Markless of Information Management
Associates. The report from the seminar will feed into a book on
the subject, and it was hoped the conclusions would lead to a set
of guidelines or a toolkit for measuring impact. PP and Angela Conyers
have taken proposals for follow up work to the ACPI committee and
views would be welcome from LIRG regarding the suggested follow
up. It was noted that future developments could involve the ACL,
Society of University Librarians and the Audit Commission. BF could
refer to the opportunities in her letter to organisations.
Action BF
9.
LIR
In the absence of the LIR Editor the committee discussed the LIR
January Editorial Board meeting decision on Peer Review. The Editor
was seeking the opinion of the LIRG committee on this matter. It
was considered a good move towards implementing peer review of articles.
JED felt the peer review process should not take three months, and
there needs to be clarity about the process. The Journal of Information
Science was suggested as a model. It was felt that peer review might
discourage some contributors, and that this process should be the
author's choice. Many journals only have one peers reviewed
article per issue. JED felt that practitioner based research can
stand up to peer review. BF suggested that LIRG could support by
running a course on writing for publication. The LIRG committee
were broadly in support of the proposal. EG would be invited to
revise the author guidelines and draft guidelines for reviewers.
Action EG
8.
Treasurer's Report
In JE's absence BF reported on the financial situation. There
is approx £11,000 in the current account with commitments
of up to £5000 for the research methods accounts. There is
£6000 in the capital reserve account. There are still issues
about non-payment from the last research methods workshops.
The Treasurer and Jo Horsfall have discussed the benefits of using
online banking and would like to move towards this. There are two
possible banks of interest:
1. Co-op Community Direct Account (ethical grounds)
2. Royal Bank of Scotland Treasurers Account (standard charge)
The LIRG committee agreed that the Co-op account was the preferred
choice and authorised JE to proceed to close the Nat West Bank accounts
and set up new accounts with the Co-op Bank.
Action: JE
9.
Web Pages
AC reported that the web pages were up to date. He would ensure
that the Umbrella 2003 programme was on the LIRG website and would
include details of the AGM and reception and the presentation of
prizes by Bob McKee. JED thanked AC for putting the EGM information
on the website. All committee members were asked to check their
areas of responsibility and inform AC of any changes required.
10.
Awards and prizes - update
LIRG Postgraduate Prize 2002. JED reported there had been a very
high standard of entries. Three prizes have been awarded:
1st Ann Littlewood
- Manchester Metropolitan University
Cyberporn and moral panic: an evaluation of press reactions to pornography
on the internet.
Very highly
commended Helen Cartwright - University of Sheffield
Change in Store? An Investigation into the Impact of the Book Superstore
Environment on Use, Perceptions and Expectations of the Public Library
as a Space, Place and Experience.
Highly commended
Naomi BEHMER - University College, London.
The Role of Sanford Berman in the Elimination of Biased Terminology
in Library of Congress Subject Headings.
As there were no entries this year for the Daphne Clark Award JED
proposed that £150 and £50 should be awarded to the
2nd and 3rd placed prize winners in the postgraduate award as this
was an exceptional year. This was agreed by the committee. EG will
ask the prizewinners to write something for LIR.
Elsevier Prize
It was noted that applications had been received from Dr J Broadly-Preston
and Lyndon Pugh. NC agreed to be one of the two judges and will
ask CN or EH to be on the panel. BF will be the adjudicator.
JED has amended
the publicity material to indicate the LIRG prizes are only open
to those from UK and Ireland. NC was welcomed back to her role as
Awards Secretary. It was suggested that LIRG could consider the
CILIP Gala awards as an opportunity. NC would discuss this with
Tim Owen at CILIP
Action: NC
11.
Publicity
In LBs absence there was no formal report on publicity
12.
Any other business
There was no other business
Date of future
meetings
Wednesday 30th April SCONUL, London
3pm Thursday 3rd July at Umbrella 2003 Manchester
|